News

IIS - Rafael Wittek - 18/03/2022

NASP International and Interdisciplinary Seminars

 

Rafael Wittek (University of Groningen)
Institutions and cooperation decay. Four governance traps and how to avoid them

 

Chair: Flaminio Squazzoni (University of Milan)


18th March 2022, 
h. 14.30
NASP Graduate School in Social and Political Science
Room B, Via Pace 10 Milan 
and on Zoom


Abstract
:
Whereas some organizations are remarkably successful in sustaining the cooperative relations constituting their core processes, others face (recurrent) disruptions and decay of cooperation, thereby severely undermining the organization's ability to create value. To what degree can these differences be explained by variations in the organization's institutional arrangements? I argue that current theories of institutions and organizational governance are ill-equipped to answer this question, for two reasons. First, they are based on an outdated behavioral micro-foundation that either stresses rational gain seeking or prosocial preferences as the major driver of human action. Second, their tools to describe institutional arrangements are too coarse-grained to adequately capture important variations in their relational infrastructures. This presentation explores how to close these gaps. My argument comes in five steps. Using a social rationality approach, I first outline the contours of an alternative explanatory framework. Distinguishing between two types of managerial control philosophies (rational vs. normative) and two forms of control (bureaucratic vs. collegial) I then review the four major theoretical templates that currently inform the design of institutions and organizational governance structures: agency, stewardship, reputation, and social identity theory. Drawing on available empirical evidence, I subsequently describe how each of these design principles may trigger vicious cycles of cooperation decay. I refer to these processes as incentive, reputation, empowerment, and identity traps. I contend that the common denominator behind each of these sustainability traps is that the institutions in place fail to support the normative goal frame required to sustain joint production motivation. I then present findings from selected empirical studies showing how specific relational support structures may prevent the emergence of these governance traps, or mitigate their consequences. I conclude with a discussion of implications for future research on institutions and sustainable cooperation.


This seminar is part of the NASP International and Interdisciplinary Seminars Series 2022.

Latest News

MiCoReS Seminar | Le…

MiCoReS Seminar | Lessing & Albarracin | 10/06/2026

 Seminar   Criminal Leviathans: Why Gangs Govern Prisons a...

PSPLP Seminar | Emma…

PSPLP Seminar | Emma Del Frate | 10/06/2026

 POLS Permanent Seminar in Political and Legal Philosophy &...

WPPS Seminar | 11/6/…

WPPS Seminar | 11/6/2026 | Galanti & Bozzi

 POLS WPPS Seminars Series   Studying Agency in the P...

SOMET Conference …

SOMET Conference "Caring for Care" | 11/06/2026

The NASP PhD program in Sociology and Methodology of Social Resea...

NASP-CCA Days | 3-5 …

NASP-CCA Days | 3-5 June 2026 | CCA Turin

NASP-COLLEGIO CARLO ALBERTO DAYSFRONTIERS OF METHODS IN SOCIAL AND POL...

Workshop NetHealth |…

Workshop NetHealth | 27/05/2026 | University of Milan

  NASP is pleased to announce the workshop, organized within t...

Call 2026-2027

Call 2026-2027

  NASP Calls for Applications for 15 Ph.D. positions for A.Y. 20...

SOMET Seminar - Vale…

SOMET Seminar - Valentina Goglio - 27/05/2026

The NASP PhD program in Sociology and Methodology of Social Resea...

The Network

Logo Bg                 ES CCA LOGO ENTE Orizz no fondatori Pos RGB             ATENEO-29            UNIPV marchio A col BLU4        Polito Logo 2021 BLU 2 comp      UniTo CPS colori  

With the support of

         ML FCARIPLO cmyk  base 100mm                                 ES CSP logo 2020 RGB Orizzontale Positivo       

This site uses cookies

for the operation of the platform and for statistics . Continue if you agree.

I understand