MeMa - Mechanisms and Black Boxes - 17/01/20

MeMa - Methodology Matters

Mechanisms and Black Boxes 

17 January 2020, 13.30
Room A
NASP Graduate School
Via Pace, 10 - Milan

Maurizio Ferrera (NASP-University of Milan)

Andrew Bennett – Georgetown University
Daniel Little – University of Michigan-Dearborn
Flaminio Squazzoni – BEHAVElab and University of Milan

The mechanistic understanding of causation marks the rise of modern science as a rational and empirical endeavor independent of metaphysical assumptions. Mechanisms shift puzzling events in a scheme of antecedents and-consequents that makes the world intelligible from within. As a rhetorical device, the scheme guides our learning from the past and assists us in imagining the future. Its confirmation on the testbench of observations, moreover, yields usable knowledge for desirable changes.
Conventionally, we locate a mechanism within the 'black box' connecting a causal input and the output effect. Researchers have long been invited to open it up and better prove the existence and shape of these connections. However, mechanisms have proven as hard to grasp as once metaphysical objects had.
Some strategies equate them to the interaction of some fundamental constituents and test whether consistent models allow retrieving the effect. The move invites to a Chinese box regress that the model assumptions can conveniently bottom out. The move, nevertheless, cannot prevent the question of the tenability of these assumptions, or the doubt that the model trades relevant heterogeneity for parsimony or viability.
The concern for unsound portrayals motivates those strategies that trace the mechanism as the single sequence of occurrences in a case. In providing richer evidence, it raises the twin question of which level of detail is needed to ensure an airtight, seamless image of the process, and of how to sort the hallmarks of the causal process from the vagaries of the local context.
In short: are interactions and chains the same mechanism at different degrees of generality, or different mechanisms instead? If related, which criteria one should meet to dis/confirm the other? Then, should the two be 'nested' into a single research design for the sake of higher credibility, or can we keep on relying on the scientific division of labor among the invisible colleges?
This MeMa seminar invites leading scholars from different disciplines to engage in a conversation on fundamental questions of mechanistic causation, and the practical consequences that different responses can have on research standards, protocols, and collaborative practices.

Latest News


2023 ECSR-CCA-NASP Spring School - CfA

NASP is pleased to announce the call for applications to the eleventh ...

BBS - Jonathan Floyd…

BBS - Jonathan Floyd - 14/12/2022

  Brown Bag Seminars of Political PhilosophySeminar series Jo...

POLS IS - Raimondas …

POLS IS - Raimondas Ibenskas - 28/11/2022

 POLS Seminars Series   Raimondas Ibenskas (Universit...

MeMa - Ruud Luijkx -…

MeMa - Ruud Luijkx - 17/11-15/12/2022

MeMa - Methodology MattersCourseCausal Models Ruud LuijkxTilburg Univ...

Lecture - Richard Ca…

Lecture - Richard Caplan - 6/10/2022 University of Pavia

The University of Pavia is pleased to announce the Special 10th Anniv...

BBS - Yannis Stavrak…

BBS - Yannis Stavrakakis - 20/09/2022

Brown Bag Seminars of Political PhilosophySeminar seriesYannis Stavrak...



NASP is glad to announce     CALL FOR APPLICATIONfor theP...

Call 2022-2023

Call 2022-2023

  NASP Calls for Application for 19 Ph.D. positions for A.Y. 202...

The Network

              ES CCA LOGO ENTE Orizz no fondatori Pos RGB                          Polito Logo 2021 BLU 2 comp                   

With the support of

         ML FCARIPLO cmyk  base 100mm                                 ES CSP logo 2020 RGB Orizzontale Positivo       

This site uses cookies

for the operation of the platform and for statistics . Continue if you agree.

I understand